TJ Larkin

AI workflows

Can Claude use my software for me, like Beehiiv, Canva or ClickUp?

Short answer

Yes, through connectors. Connect a tool once, then ask in plain speech: design four Instagram posts in Canva, create a ClickUp task, tell me how many clicks my last issue got. When I checked in March 2026, Beehiiv's own connector (MCP server) was read-only: data and reports, no changes. Assume read-only until a write path is proven.

I think the future of software is using Claude or Codex to run your back-end software for you. That's already how I work.

"I'll tell it: use Canva, design a social post using my Leander Scoop templates for Instagram, pull a story from the last seven days, and give me four options."

How do connectors work?

It can do that because I already connected Canva. In Claude there's a connectors list: browse it to see all the software you can use from inside Claude. Connect the tool once, then talk to Claude about what you want done in it. My list includes Canva, ClickUp, Gmail, Notion, Vercel, Supabase and Beehiiv.

When the permission prompts come up, always approve the read-only tools. It should always be able to read. Writing is where you stay careful.

To avoid connecting every app with its own API key, I also use Composio as an integration layer.

What can I actually ask it to do?

  • Design. Within four days of connecting Canva, we had it making carousel graphics that are really nice.
  • Assign work. "Create a task for my teammate: finish the newsletter by Friday, upload the Instagram by Friday morning, then notify me." It shows up in ClickUp.
  • Answer questions about your data. I connected Beehiiv for a new team member and asked Claude for information from Beehiiv, and it pulled it without anyone opening Beehiiv.
  • Run software you can't figure out. I pay $300 a month for one piece of software that's so complicated I don't know how to use it. Now I just ask Claude to do this, this and this in it. Same for QuickBooks.
  • Set up your own tools. For a new market in my survey software, I give Claude or Codex the questions, the order, the contact info and an image, and say go put it in. I don't touch the interface.

Does this replace the software?

No, and people get confused here. You still need the software. You just won't use it as a human. Claude becomes the interface and the agent doing the actions in your software.

Gamma is a perfect example. Normally you go to the site, pick a style, upload your content and go through five or six steps. Now Claude goes through that process for you, but it's still using Gamma underneath. Same with a niche podcast tool: tell Claude to pull your last four articles, put them in the podcast tool with the voice you chose, and send you confirmation when it's posted.

I think this is good news for specialized software. No regular person is going to deal with this stuff. General AI tools won't handle all the little details of a niche job, and that's the opening for vertical products, like making carousels for news outlets from a URL. Canva is never going to build that.

Can Claude connect to Beehiiv?

Yes, with a limit. When I checked in March 2026, Beehiiv's own MCP server was read-only:

  • You can: pull your data, ask questions, and get all kinds of reports
  • You can't: change anything in Beehiiv

Shane Brady, who I work with and podcast with, built his own MCP server for Beehiiv and connected it to my 25 publications. His version could write, with a guardrail so newsletters can only be saved as drafts, never published. In a live session it found about 200 subscribers with business email domains (179 unique domains in one list, by his count) and offered to tag them all as business owners in one pass. That's an instant lead list for advertising.

The point isn't getting a spreadsheet, though that's cool. It's that it takes the action for you and it's done in Beehiiv. I hate going into Beehiiv to build segments with if-this-then-that logic. Access like this changes over time, so assume read-only until a write path is proven.

What do I actually want from it?

The ability to see each newsletter's numbers very quickly, brand by brand, instead of aggregate totals. The built-in analytics, an enterprise feature I'd barely used, didn't give me that view.

What's the catch?

Agents still try to hand the work back. Even with it in the instructions, an agent will tell me to go to a website, click this, grab the API key. I reply: no, you do it. And it goes, oh, you're right, I can do it myself. If you hit a roadblock, ask it directly: is this something you're capable of?

The bigger win isn't writing. It's the back-end grunt work, all the really annoying stuff, which these connections can now just do for you. More in what to automate first.

Answered by TJ Larkin. From AI training sessions, client calls and Local Media HQ and AI Off Leash podcast episodes in 2026. Last updated .

Related answers

TJ Larkin / Answers / AI workflows